Associated Newspapers (known for publishing The Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday and Mail Online in the UK), lost its appeal against a High Court ruling which found that it had misused private information belonging to the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle, and infringed her copyright. In this article, we summarise why Associated Newspapers lost at the Court of Appeal and provide key takeaways from this case.
The Facts
Thanks to extensive press coverage, the facts are quite well-known:
In May 2018, Meghan Markle, former US actress and star of legal drama “Suits”, married Prince Harry. The union sparked keen tabloid interest, in the UK and internationally.
In August 2018, an apparent breakdown in the relationship between the Duchess and various family members prompted her to write a letter to her father. In the letter, the Duchess discussed their difficult relationship and her unhappiness with Mr Markle’s alleged propensity to sell stories about her to the British press.
In February 2019, Mr Markle provided a copy of the letter to Associated Newspapers. Mr Markle said that he had done so because of an article published by People Magazine in the USA which misrepresented the correspondence from his daughter as an “olive branch”, when this was not the case.
Associated Newspapers, presumably viewing the letter as a major journalist scoop, proceeded to publish several extensive extracts from the letter in five articles appearing in the Mail on Sunday and Mail Online throughout February 2019, but subsequently found itself subject to a high profile lawsuit initiated against it by the Duchess.
The Claim
The Duchess claimed that Associated Newspapers had:
1. Misused her private information
“Private information” is information over which a party has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Use of such information will be “misuse” if that party’s right to privacy outweighs the using third party’s right to freedom of expression under the Human Rights Act 1998.
2. Breached her copyright in the letter
Copyright subsisted in the Duchess’ letter as an original literary work. The Duchess claimed that, as author of the letter, she owned the copyright and that this had been infringed by The Mail on Sunday articles because they had reproduced the whole or a substantial part of her copyrighted work, without her consent.
The High Court
In February 2021, the High Court granted the Duchess “summary judgment” in respect of her privacy claim and the majority of her copyright claim. A Court will only grant summary judgment against a defendant (in this case Associated Newspapers) if it considers that it has no reasonable prospect of successfully defending a claim. Associated Newspapers appealed.
The Court of Appeal
In December 2021, the appeal was dismissed for the following reasons:
Associated Newspapers attempted to rely on new evidence (including from a former member of the Kensington Palace Communications Team) which it claimed:
undermined the Duchess’ reasonable expectation of privacy in the letter; and
proved that the letter was not private because the letter had been briefed, with the Duchess’ knowledge or consent, to authors of her and Prince Harry’s biography “Finding Freedom”, and to People Magazine.
However, the key issue was whether the Duchess had put detailed contents of the letter into the public domain before The Mail on Sunday articles were published. The Court found that she had not (regardless of the fact that she realised and was possibly ambivalent to the prospect that it might be leaked). Therefore, the letter was private at the time it was published by The Mail on Sunday.
Associated Newspapers argued (in respect of both the privacy and copyright case) that its use of the Duchess’ letter was in the public interest because it was necessary and proportionate to address inaccuracies within the People Magazine article and to provide Mr Markle with a public right of reply. However, the Court held instead that the purpose of The Mail on Sunday articles was to expose the full content of the letter, in an explosive public splash designed to have maximum sensationalist impact. While it may have been necessary and proportionate to reproduce some aspects of the letter to correct the record, it was not necessary or proportionate to use almost the entire letter to do so.
The right to freedom of expression enjoyed by Mr Markle and Associated Newspapers did not outweigh the Duchess’ right to privacy or copyright because The Mail on Sunday articles were too intrusive and the reproduction of extensive extracts from the Duchess’ letter could not be justified.
In respect of the copyright claim, Associated Newspapers attempted to argue that its publications fell within a copyright exception related to reporting on current events. The Court disagreed – The Mail on Sunday articles instead reported on actual contents of the Duchess’ letter. Further, the use made of the letter could not be “fair” because it was disproportionate to any legitimate reporting purpose.
Takeaways
It is fair to say that the case has attracted significant international attention primarily as a result of the involvement of two (then) Royals.
However, there are salient commercial and legal takeaways from the High Court and Court of Appeal rulings:
Associated Newspapers initially tried to argue that the letter could not be private because the Duchess had written it intending or knowing that it would be leaked and in attempt to leverage its content to improve her public image (although this point was later dropped). While it may seem counter intuitive, a claimant’s intention to publish information at a future date (or even their indifference at it being published) does not deprive them from their reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of that information.
Similarly, a public figure does not waive their right to privacy by previously being willing to publicise certain details about their own private life. A fundamental principle underlying the right to privacy is that an individual should be able to exercise autonomy and control over information about their personal life. This is an important distinction.
On the other hand, it is suggested that if an individual themselves plays a part in invading their own privacy, this may have a bearing on damages. It is of note in this case that Associated Newspapers was only ordered to pay the Duchess a nominal sum of £1 in damages for her privacy claim.
Publishing private information to correct facts or set the record straight must be proportionate. The Mail on Sunday potentially could have escaped liability had it published only relevant and short snippets of the letter.
Copyright can often be used as a “gateway” for protecting private or confidential information.
While reporting current events can be a defence to copyright infringement, this is a highly focussed test which involves a close analysis of the actual purpose and nature of the publication. In addition, the use made of the work must still be “fair”. Assessing fairness is a multifaceted test that takes into account factors such as the extent of the use, the use made, and whether such use is proportionate.
Case
HRH Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 1810
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. Read More
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Cookie
Type
Duration
Description
__atuvc
third party
1 year
This cookie is set by Addthis to make sure you see the updated count if you share a page and return to it before our share count cache is updated.
__atuvs
third party
30 minutes
This cookie is set by Addthis to make sure you see the updated count if you share a page and return to it before our share count cache is updated.
__stripe_mid
third party
1 year
__stripe_sid
third party
30 minutes
_ga
third party
2 years
This cookie is installed by Google Analytics and collects information on how users interact with the website. The cookies store information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors. It is used to distinguish users.
_gat
third party
1 minute
Google Analytics cookies to track users as they navigate the website and help improve the website's usability.
_gid
third party
24 hours
This cookie is installed by Google Analytics and collects information on how users interact with the website. The cookies store information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors. It is used to distinguish users.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
session
1 year
Records the default button state of the corresponding category. It works only in coordination with the primary cookie.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-non-necessary
session
1 year
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The purpose of this cookie is to check whether or not the user has given their consent to the usage of cookies under the category 'Non-Necessary'.
di2
third party
1 year
This cookie is set by addthis.com on sites that allows sharing on social media. The cookie is used to track user behavior anonymously to generate usage trends to improve relevance to their services and advertising.
loc
third party
1 year
This cookie is set by Addthis. This is a geolocation cookie to understand where the users sharing the information are located.
m
third party
2 years
na_id
third party
1 year
This cookie is set by Addthis.com to enable sharing of links on social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter
NID
third party
6 months
This cookie is used to a profile based on user's interest and display personalized ads to the users.
ouid
third party
1 year
The cookie is set by Addthis which enables the content of the website to be shared across different networking and social sharing websites.
uid
third party
1 year
This cookie is used to measure the number and behavior of the visitors to the website anonymously. The data includes the number of visits, average duration of the visit on the website, pages visited, etc. for the purpose of better understanding user preferences for targeted advertisments.
um
third party
1 year
Set by addthis.com.(Purpose not known)
uvc
third party
1 year
The cookie is set by addthis.com to determine the usage of Addthis.com service.
vc
third party
1 year
This cookie is set by addthis.com on sites that allow sharing on social media.
viewed_cookie_policy
session
1 year
Is the primary cookie that records the user consent for the usage of the cookies upon accept and reject. It doesn't track any personal data and is set only upon user action (accept/reject).
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.