With Elton and David leading the way down the aisle amid a media frenzy, hundreds of couples are reported to have followed suit. Civil partnerships or “gay weddings” became lawful in the
Since the introduction of the Sexual Orientation legislation in December 2003, gay men or women have had protection against discrimination in the workplace. However, the Partnership Act 2004 introduces some new rights for same sex partners who have registered their civil partnerships and formalised their relationship or “tied the knot”.
The main change to be aware of in the workplace is that the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 has been amended to include discrimination against civil partners in the employment field. The provisions which have always applied to married persons from discrimination therefore now apply to those in a civil partnership. Therefore, it is unlawful to discriminate against a person by treating him/her less favourably than a person not in a civil partnership because he/she is in a civil partnership. The new legislation covers both direct and indirect discrimination (and only indirect discrimination can be objectively justified if it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim). The new legislation means that it is no longer permissible for employers to say that they are not extending benefits to couples in a same sex relationship on the basis that those benefits are only offered to those partners who are ‘married’. With effect from 5 December, any benefits offered to married partners should also now be offered to partners who have registered a civil partnership. Note that if benefits are offered to unmarried partners, they should also be offered to same sex partners who have not registered a civil partnership.
Employers should therefore review their policies to see what benefits they offer to the married partner of an employee, and should ensure that these are extended to the partner of an employee who has entered into a civil partnership. This could include, for example:
Note that same-sex couples in certain official relationships from other countries including
Employers should therefore review their policies and contractual documentation to ensure that they reflect the new arrangements and to make it clear that where there are any references to “marriage” or “spouse”, this also includes “civil partnership” and “civil partner”. The ACAS guidance recommends notifying staff about these changes, and employees will need to notify someone within the organisation (on a confidential basis) if they want to take advantage of any of these changes. If a notice is sent round the organisation, it could be a sensible time to remind employees of their obligations not to discriminate on the grounds of actual or perceived sexual orientation, or on the grounds that someone is in a civil partnership. Obviously, it will be important to ensure that any information obtained which relates to an individual’s sexual orientation is kept confidential, and that the terms of the Data Protection Act are complied with. It may not actually be necessary to ask individuals seeking to rely upon these rights whether they are in a civil partnership or a marriage since the rights are the same.
With the government expecting somewhere between 11,000 and 22,000 people to be in a civil partnership by 2010, employers would be well advised to ensure that their policies are up to date and ready for when the pealing of pink wedding bells is heard in their office.
You can register online or follow us on Twitter or LinkedIn to receive our latest news, events and publications.