Towards the end of last month the Court of Appeal gave judgment which has significantly increased the risk for businesses at any point of a supply chain of committing a criminal offence where goods are made in contravention of environmental and working conditions laws.
The case before the Court of Appeal concerned cotton goods which it was claimed were produced through forced Uyghur labour, so rendering them criminally tainted under UK law.
However, goods produced around the world using forced or child labour include:
Further, the Court of Appeal’s decision can also be applied to goods which have been manufactured in breach of environmental laws anywhere in the world.
The handling of goods tainted by criminality means that money laundering is occurring for the purposes of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA), a statute designed to tackle money laundering by enabling the confiscation or civil recovery of proceeds derived from criminal activities.
A business that knows or even simply suspects that there has been a breach of forced or child labour laws or environmental laws could be at risk of prosecution under this Act.
As a result all businesses in supply chains should urgently map their supply chains to ensure compliance. They need to rigorously review purchase agreements and confirm that their products do not involve forced or child labour or breach environmental laws.
The Court of Appeal made two pivotal determinations:
Identification of Criminal Property: The court ruled that it is unnecessary to identify a specific consignment of forced labour cotton for the National Crime Agency (NCA) to initiate an investigation. This effectively broadens the scope for investigating and addressing forced labour in supply chains.
Status of Criminal Property Post-Transaction: The court refuted the notion that criminal property is “cleansed” once sold at market value. Instead, while a purchaser paying market value is protected, this protection does not extend to subsequent transactions. Essentially, criminal property remains tainted, and liability can transfer to subsequent buyers.
In light of these developments, companies should:
The Labour government may need to introduce a moratorium to provide businesses time to adjust their supply chains in response to this judgment. The process of onboarding new manufacturers is complex and time-consuming, making immediate compliance at best challenging.
In the wake of the Court of Appeal’s decision, the NCA is likely to reassess its stance on investigating the specific concerns raised by the appellants in this case. This could herald a new era of heightened scrutiny and enforcement regarding forced or child labour and environmental laws in supply chains.
The treatment of Uyghurs and its implications for supply chains is a pressing legal and ethical issue that demands immediate attention from businesses. The Court of Appeal’s judgment serves as a pivotal moment, reinforcing the need for comprehensive due diligence and ethical sourcing practices to ensure compliance and uphold human rights.