When considering the potential application of the National Security and Investment Act (NSIA) regime, it is crucial to appreciate that the NSIA is not limited to entities and assets which are based or domiciled in the UK. Indeed, the NSIA can apply to overseas entities whose main operations may be located abroad or, in some cases, who do not have any physical presence in the UK.
The extraterritorial scope of the NSIA applies to transactions which involve:
An acquisition might be covered by the rules if a Qualifying Entity or Qualifying Asset is being or has been acquired, and if that acquisition meets other tests in the NSIA that would make it a trigger event.
If the entity or asset being acquired qualifies, you may need to get approval from the government before you can complete the acquisition, or the government may be able to call in that acquisition to investigate it.
The UK government can also impose certain conditions on an acquisition and in rare cases may unwind or block an acquisition completely.
It is also worth remembering that even intra-group transactions and restructurings may be within the scope of the NSIA if the group in question has a sufficient UK nexus.
For an overview of the NSIA regime, please see our earlier articles which can be found here and here.
In Guidance on the NSIA’s Application to Overseas Entities, the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy confirms that the key issue as to whether an entity or asset will be within the scope of the NSIA is whether or not it has a sufficient UK nexus. The guidance includes the examples below:
As shown above, parties need to be mindful of the potential extra-territorial application of the NSIA to acquisitions where the acquired group carries on activities in the UK even if the entity or asset being acquired is not established or located in the UK. The NSIA’s statutory timelines for review (at least 30 working days) mean that the application of the NSIA could significantly impact on a transaction’s timeframe.
In respect of mandatory notifications, unless parties are content to pre-notify ahead of signing (we are regularly seeing parties take this approach), transaction documentation will likely need to be structured in a split exchange and completion fashion rather than a simultaneous closing.
Where notification is voluntary, the parties will need to evaluate the risks of the likelihood of the transaction being called-in. If a voluntary notification is made (and approved) this will provide investors / acquirers with certainty that the transaction will not be open to challenge post-closing.
If the parties decide not to make a voluntary notification, the risk that a transaction may be called in can be mitigated by either seeking guidance informally from the Investment Security Unit (ISU) prior to completion and / or starting the clock on the six-month period by publishing details of the transaction immediately post-completion to make the Secretary of State “aware” (though the NSIA does not yet prescribe what will constitute awareness for this purpose).